{
  "status": "Display layer only. These overlapping navigation tags are editorial interpretations of the supplied seed fields, not new historical coding or counts. Original seed records are preserved unchanged in prototype.json.",
  "mechanisms": {
    "heredity": "Claims about inborn qualities, inheritance, or the limits of hereditary inference.",
    "environment": "Claims invoking nutrition, social advantage, economic position, education, or conditions of life.",
    "measurement": "Claims about records, proxies, criteria, units, or methods of inquiry.",
    "reproduction": "Claims concerning descent, reproductive selection, or reproductive arrangements.",
    "uncertainty": "Qualifications concerning knowledge, inference, criteria, timing, or generalization. An explicit selection rule is not itself uncertainty.",
    "improvement": "Statements specifying desired qualities or proposing improved conditions or outcomes.",
    "intervention": "Proposals to act, to limit action, or to defer it; inquiry is distinguished from implementation in the original fields.",
    "authority": "Claims explicitly assigning or disputing who defines, guides, or authorizes a program."
  },
  "claims": {
    "G01-01": {
      "statement": "Eugenics should improve inborn qualities; the broad definition also concerns their development.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "heredity",
        "improvement"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "paraphrase",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The address distinguishes improving inborn qualities from their development."
    },
    "G01-02": {
      "statement": "Conflicting ideals need not prevent improvement within different classes or sects.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "improvement",
        "reproduction",
        "authority",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "paraphrase",
        "proposed_action",
        "decision_authority",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The animal fable is an analogy, not observational evidence."
    },
    "G01-03": {
      "statement": "Specified desirable qualities are put forward as shared criteria.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "improvement",
        "authority"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "claim_role",
        "coding_note",
        "decision_authority"
      ],
      "qualification": "Normative qualities are named; measurement scales and weights are not supplied."
    },
    "G01-04": {
      "statement": "Case collection prioritizes families with at least three adult male children and superior positions compared with early classmates.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "reproduction"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "claim_role",
        "paraphrase",
        "unit_of_reference",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The case definition precedes the proposed database."
    },
    "G01-05": {
      "statement": "Public uptake is urged while hasty action and overzealous proposals are cautioned against.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "uncertainty",
        "intervention",
        "authority"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "uncertainty",
        "proposed_action",
        "decision_authority",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Restraint and public mobilization coexist. This seed combines propositions that may need further segmentation."
    },
    "P01-01": {
      "statement": "A society’s capacity to found a science without an authoritative founder and school is doubted.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "authority",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "decision_authority",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This is the contributor’s account of scientific authority, not a demonstrated law of discovery."
    },
    "P01-02": {
      "statement": "The paper’s author is commended as a guide to maintaining next-generation mental and physical qualities.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "heredity",
        "improvement",
        "authority"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "paraphrase",
        "decision_authority",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "No new equation is supplied in this contribution."
    },
    "W03-01": {
      "statement": "Professional success can reflect inherited social advantage and knowledge of advancement rather than superior natural ability alone.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "environment",
        "heredity",
        "measurement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Disputing this hereditary inference is not a denial of heredity."
    },
    "W03-02": {
      "statement": "Consciously selecting successes is rejected because individuality escapes a narrow list of desirable types.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "reproduction",
        "uncertainty",
        "intervention"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "claim_role",
        "proposed_action",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This objection remains separate from the contributor’s sterilization proposal."
    },
    "W03-03": {
      "statement": "Sterilization of those described as failures is endorsed.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "reproduction",
        "intervention"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "claim_role",
        "proposed_action",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Criticism of selection criteria coexists with a reproductive intervention proposal."
    },
    "W02-01": {
      "statement": "Description is distinguished from explanation, while the value of statistical description and prediction is defended.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This is a philosophy of statistics asserted by the contributor."
    },
    "W02-02": {
      "statement": "Laboratory findings require statistical and broader-population checks before becoming eugenic maxims.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "heredity",
        "environment",
        "measurement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "claim_role",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Broader validation is demanded without rejecting experiments or Mendelian inquiry."
    },
    "V01-01": {
      "statement": "Poor conditions of life are emphasized in evaluating deterioration and reform.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "environment",
        "improvement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Population-pressure claims in this contribution are not verified here."
    },
    "V01-02": {
      "statement": "Tracking male names may omit descendants through women.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "reproduction",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The disappearance of a surname is not the disappearance of descendants."
    },
    "V01-03": {
      "statement": "Improving women’s conditions and education is proposed in connection with future generations.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "environment",
        "reproduction",
        "improvement",
        "intervention"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The proposal retains the contributor’s historical concern with reproduction and future generations."
    },
    "S01-01": {
      "statement": "A eugenic program is endorsed in civilizational terms.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "reproduction",
        "improvement",
        "intervention"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "paraphrase",
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This is a written communication, not a recorded spoken intervention."
    },
    "S01-02": {
      "statement": "Reproduction under public conditions is proposed outside ordinary marriage constraints, alongside existing marriage.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "reproduction",
        "intervention",
        "authority",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "decision_authority",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The proposal does not by itself establish compulsory mating."
    },
    "H01-01": {
      "statement": "Nutrition and environment are argued to offer a more promising intervention than stock-changing.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "environment",
        "improvement",
        "intervention",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This comparative claim is not a trial; no quantified intervention effect is established."
    },
    "H02-01": {
      "statement": "Knowledge is judged inadequate for regulating a powerful human passion.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "heredity",
        "reproduction",
        "uncertainty",
        "intervention"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "unit_of_reference",
        "uncertainty",
        "proposed_action",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Uncertainty constrains immediate intervention."
    },
    "H02-02": {
      "statement": "Sufficiently precise evidence could change ethical and legislative judgments.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "heredity",
        "environment",
        "uncertainty",
        "intervention",
        "authority"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "uncertainty",
        "proposed_action",
        "decision_authority",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "Present restraint is not principled opposition to every future intervention."
    },
    "R02-01": {
      "statement": "Are current best specimens being made the standard for future averages?",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "improvement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "claim_role",
        "paraphrase",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This written objection distinguishes an exemplar from a representative average."
    },
    "R02-02": {
      "statement": "Can all families be large and thriving, and might acquisitiveness or capital explain apparent success?",
      "mechanisms": [
        "environment",
        "measurement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The contributor also makes separate restrictive reproductive claims; this proposition cannot stand for the whole position."
    },
    "M03-01": {
      "statement": "Economic position is separated from biological interpretation; development through environment is emphasized.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "environment",
        "measurement",
        "improvement",
        "intervention",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "This is a historically expressed causal claim in a written contribution, not modern proof."
    },
    "B01-01": {
      "statement": "Controlled breeding is argued to reveal inheritance patterns obscured by broad aggregate statistics.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "heredity",
        "measurement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "causal_factors",
        "claim_role",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The contribution supports the inquiry’s aims while contesting its method."
    },
    "K01-01": {
      "statement": "Individual excellence is not automatically social efficiency.",
      "mechanisms": [
        "measurement",
        "uncertainty"
      ],
      "basis": [
        "claim_role",
        "unit_of_reference",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "qualification": "The contributor’s allegations about another participant are not independently validated here."
    }
  },
  "flow_pathways": [
    {
      "claim_id": "G01-02",
      "difference": "Different classes and sects",
      "explanation": "Improvement within each type",
      "action": "Selective reproduction",
      "qualification": "Analogy; moral disagreement remains.",
      "basis": [
        "unit_of_reference",
        "paraphrase",
        "proposed_action",
        "evidence_invoked",
        "uncertainty"
      ]
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "H01-01",
      "difference": "Children’s development",
      "explanation": "Nutrition and environment",
      "action": "Improve feeding",
      "qualification": "Clinical claim; no measured effect here.",
      "basis": [
        "unit_of_reference",
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "evidence_invoked",
        "coding_note"
      ],
      "packet_context": "RESEARCH_PACKET.md §2.2, Robert Hutchison: feeding and development"
    },
    {
      "claim_id": "W03-01",
      "difference": "Professional success",
      "explanation": "Social advantage may contribute",
      "action": "Reconsider success as a hereditary proxy",
      "qualification": "Disputed inference; not a denial of heredity.",
      "basis": [
        "paraphrase",
        "causal_factors",
        "proposed_action",
        "uncertainty",
        "coding_note"
      ]
    }
  ]
}